InGen Photo Shoot
January 4, 2012 Leave a Comment
Thanks to CU Communications Office for taking this photo shoot of my Intergenerational Ministries course. These are some of my best students in one of the best classes ever.
A FellowTraveler in God’s Kingdom
January 4, 2012 Leave a Comment
Thanks to CU Communications Office for taking this photo shoot of my Intergenerational Ministries course. These are some of my best students in one of the best classes ever.
December 27, 2011 1 Comment
All leaders want to look forward and see what’s coming on the horizon. Every year I write 5 to 7 goals for myself in several categories: spiritual, financial, marriage & family, career, personal. I like to think, envision and dream about the future. If you don’t have a target, you’ll hit it everytime.
For 2011, I met 5 of my 7 goals (71.4%). Not too bad. Those were:
I didn’t complete two goals: 1) career – find a publisher for Theology 4 Kids (my book). I was turned down 3x’s. Stink! Or 2) financial - buy a new car in cash. Both vehicles are still running fine and didn’t need replacing, which I am very thankful for.
So what’s on the horizon for 2012. Here’s the list.
What’s your goals for 2012?
October 23, 2011 Leave a Comment
I think I am on to something here. This idea has probably been written about by numerous authors and theologians in years past, but truthfully, I’ve not heard anyone say this exactly. Here is my hunch.
I believe the full embrace of postmodernity (or POMO) by the larger American Evangelical church over the past 40 years is a significant contributor to the re-emergence of reformed theology, especially among younger Christians. There it is friends, my ity-bity contribution to the theological and cultural conversation of our time. Let me further explain.
Postmodernity, in its American iteration, has several core convictions. One, there is no absolute truth from religion, science, empircal evidence, period. Two, there are no perfectly moral right or wrongs which every person must live by. Third, no person can push their view of morality on any other person. That would be intolerant which is the unpardonable sin for postmoderns. And fourth, all religious expressions are equally valid even the choice to have NO religious expression at all.
If you consider carefully the 4 basic POMO convictions, you can easily see where this worldview left an enormous void. The void of definitive truth. My thought is this void has been filled predominately by the re-emergence of reformed theology, especially among younger Christian who swoon over the Young, Restless, and Reformed (YYR’s) movement. YYR’s are demanding a hard look at Evangelical Christianity and are pushing for a radical pendulum shift.
Unlike any previous Evangelical movement over the past 40 years (including the Billy Graham Crusades, the Jesus Hippies, the Mega-Church phenomenon, the Moral Majority, the Prosperity Gospel, or the Emergent Church), YYR’s are more biblical, more theological, more hostile toward vagueness, more passionate about the exclusivity of Christ, and are entirely intolerant of any biblical Christianity that is wishy-washy. They want black and white period; reject all hints of greyness.
It is my contention that POMO created this vacuum. POMO shifted our culture toward an extremely hyper-passive, morally confused haze that reformed theology (especially Neo-Calvinism) is diabolically opposed to. YYR’s celebrates declarative theology and has a no-holds barred view on truth. The movement has little room for debate and forces each individual to take a side: either you’re in or you’re out. There is no room for POMO tolerance, indecisiveness and perennial ambiguity. Get on the train or be left behind.
So here is my hypothesis: Without postmodernity, there would not have been the renewed interest in reformed theology. With postmodernity now in full bloom, reformed theology will be around for quite some time.
October 16, 2010 1 Comment
While driving back from Catalyst 2010, I took the opportunity to quiz the students I was traveling with on how they view online relationships & cell phone etiquette. What’s legal and what’s rude. Here is a sampling of their responses.
1. First interaction online (thru Facebook or Chat) does not equal a real first interaction. If they saw each other the next day, they would still feel awkward as if they were interacting for the very first time.
2. They will share more about themselves online than face-to-face, only because its private and behind closed doors. However, you are not allowed to bring up what they posted online unless you were there with them. That is an invasion of privacy.
3. Cell phones – You can take a call from a friend while with others in public, but they expect you to leave the table. If someone is on a call in a group setting everyone else will get quiet. They don’t want to interrupt your call.
4. Text messages – They are legal at all times to take. But not legal at all times to respond. When Millennials are in a group setting where folks are facing each other (like in a circle), they don’t want to look like a text addict (on the CrackBerry), so they will take the text, but wait till afterwards to respond.
However, when they are in an academic class setting (my world) with everyone facing forward, everything is legal because there isn’t any peer pressure from other Millennials. In church, receiving and sending is totally legal, especially during the preaching. At work, all is legal as long as your boss isn’t looking.
5. Ear Buds & iPods – One bud in the ear is legal all the time. Both buds are considered rude when in a conversation with someone. However, both buds in are an indication that they don’t want to be bothered. It is a sign to others, I’m not open for business. Come back tomorrow.
6. Finally, they love their online personalities but they still want personal interaction. Girls don’t like to be asked out online. That’s icky. They also don’t want to receive a thank you through a text, they want something personal.
FUN FACT: One side note I learned is that Millennial girls will send a “mistaken” text message to a guy they are interested in. They will say they were trying to send the text to a girlfriend, but “whoops” it went to the guy. Something like “Oh, he’s hot” or “I’d wish he’d ask me out.” So the guy will get the text message and know the girl is interested. And they will just play it off as if they don’t know what happened. “I just got this phone. I must’ve hit the wrong button.”
It appears new courtship rules apply in the digital age.
July 9, 2010 Leave a Comment
Here are the books that have been filling my head so far in 2010. A wide range of topics and themes.
Next on my reading plate are:
April 30, 2010 Leave a Comment
P.S.Q. Puritans. Shakers. Quakers. My summer 2010 reading list will focus around the early colonial religious groups known as Puritans, Shakers, and Quakers. We’re headin’ back in time to when it all began here in the New World.
As for the Puritans, I am going to continue my study of the life and times of Jonathan Edwards. I read a short biography of Edwards during my Israel trip and it sparked much interest in the subject. This summer I am tackling a larger biography written by Perry Miller (1949).
As for the Shakers, I am reading a contemporary history written by Suzanne Skees entitled “God Among the Shakers” (1998). Skees went and lived with the last remaining Shakers in Maine and has written both a history and a first-person account of their religious views and practices.
As for the Quakers, I am still looking for the book I will read on them. If you have any suggestions, send them my why.
As for the WHY? Why spend your summer reading histories about early American colonialism and the spiritual climate of that time. Well…the short answer is that I want to remain a life-long learner and I love to read.
Secondly, I know very little about this time period and feel like I might benefit from a historical journey. I am hoping to learn a lot about our present spiritual climate when studying our past. Going to the beginning of our American spiritual experience might shed light in our postmodern present age.
We shall see. Or maybe I should say, “If God has preordained it.”
Recent Comments